† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier 2 Grant No. (2018-T2-1-007) and USA ONRG Grant No. (N62909-19-1-2047). JL is supported by MOE PhD RSS. KJAO acknowledges the funding support of Xiamen University Malaysia Research Fund, Grant Nos. XMUMRF/2019-C3/IECE/0003 and XMUMRF/2020-C5/IENG/0025, and the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant No. Scheme, Grant No. FRGS/1/2019/TK08/XMU/02. CZ acknowledges the funding support by the Australian Research Council (Grant No. DP160101474).
Prototypical three-dimensional (3D) topological Dirac semimetals (DSMs), such as Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, contain electrons that obey a linear momentum–energy dispersion with different Fermi velocities along the three orthogonal momentum dimensions. Despite being extensively studied in recent years, the inherent Fermi velocity anisotropy has often been neglected in the theoretical and numerical studies of 3D DSMs. Although this omission does not qualitatively alter the physics of light-driven massless quasiparticles in 3D DSMs, it does quantitatively change the optical coefficients which can lead to nontrivial implications in terms of nanophotonics and plasmonics applications. Here we study the linear optical response of 3D DSMs for general Fermi velocity values along each direction. Although the signature conductivity-frequency scaling, σ(ω) ∝ ω, of 3D Dirac fermion is well-protected from the Fermi velocity anisotropy, the linear optical response exhibits strong linear dichroism as captured by the universal extinction ratio scaling law, Λij = (vi/vj)2 (where i ≠ j denotes the three spatial coordinates x,y,z, and vi is the i-direction Fermi velocity), which is independent of frequency, temperature, doping, and carrier scattering lifetime. For Cd3As2 and Na3Bi3, an exceptionally strong extinction ratio larger than 15 and covering a broad terahertz window is revealed. Our findings shed new light on the role of Fermi velocity anisotropy in the optical response of Dirac semimetals and open up novel polarization-sensitive functionalities, such as photodetection and light modulation.
In recent decades, significant effort has been dedicated to the study of topological insulators (TIs) and low-dimension semimetals like graphene. In the low-energy limit, the electrons in these exotic materials obey relativistic, Dirac-like Hamiltonians. Their pseudo-massless particle behavior confers these materials unique optical properties such as high electromagnetic field confinement[1–4] and strong optical nonlinearity,[5–16] making them desirable for uses like table-top generation of high-brightness coherent radiation spanning from the x-ray to the terahertz regimes through mechanisms such as free-electron-graphene plasmon scattering,[17,18] high-harmonic generation,[19–22] and transition radiation,[23] and also as saturable absorbers for infrared ultrafast lasers.[24–27]
Recently, a new class of quantum materials which behave like the bulk analogues of graphene have also attracted significant attention – 3D Dirac semimetals (DSMs). Unlike their TI counterparts which possess only conducting surface states, 3D DSMs are also conducting in the bulk. The dispersion of 3D DSMs is formed from a superposition of two Weyl cones of opposite chiralities.[29,28] Each Weyl cone is linearly dispersing in all three momentum directions and is doubly-degenerate at a single band-touching point (Weyl node). Hence, the energy bands are doubly-degenerate for all momenta except at the Dirac point, where a four-fold degeneracy arises from the overlap of two Weyl nodes. Topologically unprotected Dirac points may occur at a quantum critical point in the phase transition between a TI and a normal insulator[30–36] or between weak and strong TIs.[37] Some Dirac points are guaranteed by virtue of crystal symmetries[29,30,38,39] and unlike graphene, are robust against spin–orbit interaction-induced gapping. These stable Dirac points have been predicted in materials like BiO2[38] and A3Bi (A = K, Rb),[29] and experimentally detected in Cd3As2[40–42] and Na3Bi.[44,43]
As the electrons in 3D DSMs also possess linear dispersions, they have been expected to exhibit qualitatively-similar field response to graphene.[21,45] Hence, for applications where the properties of graphene are desired in bulk materials, 3D DSMs present themselves as natural candidates.[40,44,45] For instance, Cd3As2[46–48] has been shown to perform well as saturable absorbers in the mid-IR regime[49] owing to its strong broadband light–matter interaction,[50,51] much like graphene. Furthermore, they can be realized as optical thin films,[51,52] enabling the application of conventional semiconductor methods for parameter control.[51] Recent exciting experiments have also demonstrated generation of terahertz radiation up to the 3rd[53] and 7th[54] harmonics, and a theoretical study predicted the generation of harmonics beyond the 31st order with conversion efficiencies far exceeding the high-harmonic generation (HHG) in graphene by virtue of a finite interaction volume. For these reasons, 3D DSMs are attractive candidates for novel nanophotonic and nanoplasmonic applications or as viable alternatives to graphene. With increasing exploration into the potential applications of 3D DSMs, a theoretical understanding of how Dirac physics determine the linear and nonlinear optical properties is crucial. The slope of the linearly dispersing Dirac conic band structure around the nodal band touching point is commonly referred as the Fermi velocity, which serves as an important velocity-like parameter that characterizes the electronic band structure of Dirac materials. While a few works[45,55,56] have provided a theoretical treatment for the linear optical response of a 3D Dirac dispersion, none has studied the effects of the pronounced anisotropy between the Fermi velocities along different directions – a property inherently present in 3D DSMs which have been discovered so far, on the linear optical response. As such, it is crucial to include these effects and examine if these anisotropies can be exploited for novel applications.
In this work, we derive the linear interband and intraband conductivities using the Kubo formula. We use a Hamiltonian which describes arbitrary Fermi velocity in each direction, taking us beyond previous works which were restricted to the isotropic dispersion. In obtaining our expressions for the dynamic conductivities in each direction, we find that both the intraband and interband conductivities of 3D DSMs scale as σii ∝ vi/(vjvk), where i,j,k∈{x,y,z}, i is the direction parallel to the incident light polarization, and j and k are the directions perpendicular to the incident light polarization. Additionally, we show that the anisotropy between the responses of the i and j directions exhibits the analytical universal scaling relation for the optical conductivity, σi/σj ∝ (vi/vj)2.
For realistic 3D DSMs such as Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, this anisotropy ratio can exceed an order of magnitude, emphasizing the importance of including anisotropy in optical calculations. More intriguingly, the optical extinction ratio reaches 15.8 and 19.2, respectively, for Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, which is substantially higher than that of vast majority of anisotropic optical materials previously reported (see Table
Close to the Dirac point, an electron within a 3D Dirac semimetal with momentum p = (px,py,pz) obeys the following low-energy effective Hamiltonian:
Figure
We now turn our attention to the dielectric function of anisotropic DSMs. We compute the diagonal (i.e., longitudinal) elements of the dielectric tensor from the conductivity by
We see from Fig.
In the above analysis, we have considered an isotropic value of ϵ∞ which is frequently measured in experiments. We expect that the measured value of ϵ∞ should be significantly different in each direction, the incident light polarization (with ω appropriately chosen) could tune not only parameters like the field confinement factor, but also serve as a switch between dielectric and metallic operation regimes. This arises as the zero-crossing Re(ϵii) = 0 occurs at different values of ωp,i for each direction i. Hence the anisotropy could additionally serve as a tuning parameter for the nature of light–matter interaction within 3D DSMs.
We now calculate the absorption coefficient in the i ∈ {x,y,z} Cartesian direction as[62,63]
We have shown, using the Kubo–Greenwood formula, that when the anisotropic Fermi velocities in each direction are included, the optical response along each direction varies significantly. While the characteristic optical signatures of 3D Dirac electrons like the σ(ω) ∝ ω scaling are retained, our results show that the magnitude along each direction scales as vi/(vjvk). This leads to the following universal scaling of the optical anisotropy ratio between the i and j directions: σii/σjj = ϵii/ϵjj = (vi/vj)2 – a value which exceeds 15 times for Cd3As2 and 19 times for Na3Bi, as shown in Table
In summary, we studied the linear optical response of topological Dirac semimetal. We found that the optical conductivity exhibits strong anisotropy with the universal scaling law, Λij = (vi/vj)2, independent of temperature, Fermi level, and scattering effects, and is broadly applicable to the sub-THZ to at least 50 THz frequency window. Recently, the optical properties of topological semimetals with nodal topology beyond Dirac semimetal, such as Weyl semimetal[74] and nodal loop semimetal,[75–78] have been extensively studied. We expect this ever-expanding family of topological semimetals,[79] in which the optical and electronic properties are highly anisotropic along different crystal directions, to continually offer interesting platforms for the uncovering of exotic anisotropic optics and optoelectronic phenomena critical for the design of next-generation novel devices.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] | |
[39] | |
[40] | |
[41] | |
[42] | |
[43] | |
[44] | |
[45] | |
[46] | |
[47] | |
[48] | |
[49] | |
[50] | |
[51] | |
[52] | |
[53] | |
[54] | |
[55] | |
[56] | |
[57] | |
[58] | |
[59] | |
[60] | |
[61] | |
[62] | |
[63] | |
[64] | |
[65] | |
[66] | |
[67] | |
[68] | |
[69] | |
[70] | |
[71] | |
[72] | |
[73] | |
[74] | |
[75] | |
[76] | |
[77] | |
[78] | |
[79] |